What Would Jesus Eat? An Old Yorker Investigation

Here at the Old Yorker, we make a big show of not caring about our readers. When they say they want more of something we have published, we resolve never to write about that particular subject again. When they tell us they like something we have done, we secretly hate ourselves. We are ornery that way.

So, it will not surprise you to learn that we open our reader mail mostly in order to scoff or sometimes to look for identities to steal.

Still, it did not escape our notice that our recent article attempting to answer a question posed to us by a bumper sticker, “what would Jesus drive?,” drew an unusually large response from our subscribers. Several people pointed out that speculating about what Jesus might or might not have done when faced with a modern problem is a “meme,” a word we don’t entirely understand but which apparently also describes that “two girls, one cup” business.

The large volume of mail inspired us to do a little soul-searching. Is it really right for us to have such deep contempt for our readers? Is that really a Christian way to behave? The answer, clearly, is no. And so, as a penance, we have decided to further examine the general question, “What would Jesus do?” by breaking it into its constituent parts. Today, for instance, we will try to answer the specific question:

What would Jesus eat?

Our basic axiom is that what Jesus would do in the present is whatever he did do 2,000 years ago. And for that information we are blessed with a plethora of sources including, most importantly, the Good Book itself. Scholars of Biblical times tell us that the two main meals in Jesus’ day were taken at about noon and in the evening, essentially lunch and dinner. Diners sat on an animal skin spread on the ground or reclined on couches or were seated at a table, as in Leonardo da Vinci’s mural of the Last Supper, made famous by the book “The Da Vinci Code.”

With the possible exception of the spoon, the standard dining utensils were all known to people of Jesus’ day. But their usage was restricted to the upper reaches of the elite. Ordinary people would have eaten their meal by dipping bread in a communal bowl.

Okay, so now we know how Jesus ate but not what he might have eaten. Although many foods are mentioned in the Old Testament, including the grains spelt and millet in Ezekiel, meats like venison, antelope, and mountain sheep in Deuteronomy, fruits and vegetables like apples in the Song of Solomon, cucumbers in Numbers, and the ubiquitous dates in the Second Book of Samuel, in the New Testament, Matthew seems to have been the only foodie among the Apostles. From his account, we can conclude that Jesus would enjoy a meal of the following:

Leavened bread
Honey
Mustard
Mint
Dill
Cumin
Locusts
Chicken

Obviously, anything in a honey-mustard sauce would probably appeal to Jesus and while locusts are not often eaten today, they are an excellent source of protein and, perhaps, might be tastily fried in cumin and chicken fat.

Here is a menu you might prepare if you had Jesus over for dinner that includes most of his favorite foods:

Fried locusts with cumin aioli
Dill chicken with mustard
Leavened bread
Honey-mint ice cream

As to “what would Jesus drink?,” even the casual Christian knows of Jesus’ fondness for both water and, famously, wine. He was also given a spongeful of vinegar as a refreshment during His crucifixion but somehow we don’t think that’s an experience He would choose to repeat!

Published in: on February 10, 2008 at 8:36 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: ,

What Would Jesus Drive? An Old Yorker Investigation

While waiting at a traffic light a few days ago, we happened to notice a bumper sticker on the car in front of us which asked, “What Would Jesus Drive?” This got us thinking.

What would Jesus drive?

We began our search for an answer to this puzzling question at the public library where a helpful older person directed us toward a dusty shelf of books about the history of the Ancient World. To our surprise, transportation technologies are a major topic in such books, because of the role that transportation plays in expanding markets and, more generally, civilizations. For example, the invention of the spoked wheel led directly to the development of techniques of chariot warfare, the equivalent, in Ancient terms, of the invention of the atomic bomb.

As a man of peace, it is very unlikely that Jesus would ever have fought as a charioteer in any theater of the warfare endemic to the Holy Land in the Biblical era. Nor is it likely that he would have driven a chariot as a method of routine conveyance since the vehicles were only used for warfare or gladiatorial games. If Jesus drove anything, it would most likely have been a wagon pulled by oxen or a tamed ass or one of the many forms of human powered transportation in ancient Palestine such as a handcart or a litter.

We can say for certain that Jesus, as an observant Jew, would not have driven a plough pulled by both an ox and ass or any sort of camel-powered conveyance. The former configuration was forbidden by Mosaic law (Deuteronomy 22:10 inter alia) and the camel was considered unclean by the Hebrews of Jesus’ time.

Still, while we may speculate based on the Biblical evidence, the Gospels are silent on what exactly Jesus drove. We are told by St. Matthew that Jesus rode both a donkey and its untamed foal into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday when He entered the city in triumph. While it is possible that Matthew was confused by a metrical repetition in some Hebrew poetry describing the events leading up to the Crucifixion, these two animals, the mature or immature donkey, seems like the only legitimate answer to the question, “What would Jesus drive?” if we expand the nation of “drive” to include “ride.”

Published in: on February 4, 2008 at 8:00 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.